Date
Publisher
arXiv
As generative AI (genAI) rapidly enters classrooms, accompanied by
district-level policy rollouts and industry-led teacher trainings, it is
important to rethink the canonical ``adopt and train'' playbook. Decades of
educational technology research show that tools promising personalization and
access often deepen inequities due to uneven resources, training, and
institutional support. Against this backdrop, we conducted semi-structured
interviews with 22 teachers from a large U.S. school district that was an early
adopter of genAI. Our findings reveal the motivations driving adoption, the
factors underlying resistance, and the boundaries teachers negotiate to align
genAI use with their values. We further contribute by unpacking the
sociotechnical dynamics -- including district policies, professional norms, and
relational commitments -- that shape how teachers navigate the promises and
risks of these tools.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Why use AI?
Study design
