• Introducing Claude for Teachers

    | Anthropic

    Decades of research show that practices like differentiation, mastery-based learning, and small group instruction reliably improve student achievement, but teachers are often short on time and resources to implement them. Budgets are stretched, classes may be too large to meet every student's individual needs, and planning often spills into evenings. This strain is heaviest in under-resourced schools. Claude for Teachers is designed to close the gap between educational best practices and what a teacher's week allows.

    Early evidence suggests that while the impact of AI tools for students is mixed and depends on the implementation, AI tools for teachers can strengthen instructional practice and improve student outcomes. This is the aim of Claude for Teachers: support the craft behind great teaching and protect what teachers value most—time with their students.

  • High-Impact Tutoring, With A Twist

    | Forbes

    High-impact tutoring (HIT), or high-dosage tutoring, is widely endorsed by educational leaders, advocates, and researchers to help improve outcomes for students. HIT is defined by several key components, all of which have been employed by Read Alliance since its inception (and long before the terminology of “high-impact tutoring” or “high-dosage tutoring” was defined and in use):

    • Frequent (3+ times per week)
    • Small group size (no more than four students per tutor, with one-to-one tutoring as the preferred model)
    • Targeted instruction focused on specific skills or learning gaps, and designed to complement classroom instruction
    • Led by trained instructors who receive ongoing support and oversight
    • Consistent tutor-student relationship that fosters a strong connection over time

    These components are largely attributed to Stanford University’s National Student Support Accelerator (NSSA), in which Read Alliance (READ) is listed as a vetted provider which means the READ model meets their standards for excellence widely recognized as the “stamp of approval” for HIT programming.

  • Q&A: Chris Agnew on AI and the Future of Schooling

    | FutureEd

    What is the AI for Education Hub at Stanford’s SCALE Initiative and how did you come to lead the organization?

    The goal of the Hub is to explore what’s working and what’s not with AI in education and to study how to use AI to reimagine longstanding education systems to better benefit kids.

    I spent two decades in education, almost entirely in non-traditional learning environments, like outdoor- and community-based classrooms and apprenticeships. I left that space feeling frustrated because I knew that immersive, experiential, relevant learning was impactful for kids, but it’s way too expensive to be accessible to all.

  • Study: Giving Kids Access to AI Tutors Doesn’t Mean They’ll Use Them

    | The 74

    Ed tech companies routinely pitch AI tutoring platforms as a way to deliver personalized instruction at a scale that no human teacher can match. But when researchers from Stanford University looked at how much students actually used one major AI platform, something startling happened: Students didn’t use it that much at all. 

    In the study, published Wednesday, two unnamed school districts carved out dedicated time for hundreds of elementary school students to work with a well-known AI reading tutor, either during class time or after school. Researchers followed about 350 students across two randomized controlled trials. All of the students were expected to log on for at least two 30-minute sessions a week.

  • Research on AI tutoring ran into a problem: Most students wouldn’t use it

    | Chalkbeat

    A group of Stanford University researchers started with one question: Could a human tutor providing motivation and support get students to spend more time working with an AI literacy tutor?

    The answer turned out be yes — but only between one and four minutes more per week. Many students never logged on at all.

    That left the researchers with a different set of questions.

    “A key finding that we weren’t even meaning to test is that having access to this AI tutor isn’t the same as using it,” said Carly Robinson, the lead author on the study released Wednesday and the director of research for the SCALE Initiative at the Stanford Accelerator for Learning.

  • Susanna Loeb Appointed the Inaugural Kissick Family Professor

    | Stanford Graduate School of Education

    Susanna Loeb has been appointed the inaugural Kissick Family Professor. 

    Loeb is the faculty director of the SCALE Initiative at the Stanford Accelerator for Learning, which aims to develop and disseminate evidence-driven learning solutions, and a senior fellow at the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR). Her research focuses on education policy and its role in improving educational opportunities for students, addressing issues including educator career choices and professional development, school finance and governance, and early childhood systems. She leads the Getting Down to Facts initiatives, which provide nonpartisan research and analysis to inform education policymaking in California.

  • AI is in nearly every classroom

    | Fast Company

    Yet the evidence base remains remarkably thin. A recent Stanford Accelerator for Learning review of more than 800 studies on AI in K-12 found only 20 high-quality causal studies examining learning outcomes. And the studies that do exist point to a complicated picture: Students frequently produce stronger work while using AI, but those gains often disappear—and sometimes reverse—when AI access is removed, as the OECD’s 2026 Digital Education Outlook recently found.

  • The Engine Driving High-Quality Tutoring

    | FutureEd

    What is the most important variable in high-impact tutoring?

    The humans in the school building.

    Not the platform. Not the model. Not the contract.

    The human who makes sure a student gets to their session. The human who notices when the student isn’t progressing and asks why. The human who, on a Wednesday morning when everything else is pulling at them, still notices the quiet grimace of a student who doesn’t understand, and offers another way in.

    Dosage, the amount of high-quality tutoring students receive, doesn’t just happen. Dosage is the outcome of a hundred small human decisions every single week.

  • America’s First A.I. High School Is Great. But Not Because of A.I.

    | New York Times

    There are few high-quality studies on the impact of artificial intelligence on K-12 students and teachers, and the results of the studies that exist are mixed. Stanford’s A.I. Hub for Education recently published a review of over 800 academic papers and found that “A.I. tools may help students complete tasks more successfully in the moment, but those gains do not always persist when students are later asked to perform independently.”

  • NEPC Talks Education: An Interview With Susanna Loeb About the Stanford SCALE Initiative Project

    | NEPC Talks Education