Search and Filter

Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

Evolution of AI in Education: Agentic Workflows

Authors
Firuz Kamalov,
David Santandreu Calonge,
Linda Smail,
Dilshod Azizov,
Dimple R. Thadani,
Theresa Kwong,
Amara Atif
Date
Publisher
arXiv
Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed various aspects of education, with large language models (LLMs) driving advancements in automated tutoring, assessment, and content generation. However, conventional LLMs are constrained by their reliance on static training data, limited adaptability, and lack of reasoning. To address these limitations and foster more sustainable technological practices, AI agents have emerged as a promising new avenue for educational innovation. In this review, we examine agentic workflows in education according to four major paradigms: reflection, planning, tool use, and multi-agent collaboration. We critically analyze the role of AI agents in education through these key design paradigms, exploring their advantages, applications, and challenges. To illustrate the practical potential of agentic systems, we present a proof-of-concept application: a multi-agent framework for automated essay scoring. Preliminary results suggest this agentic approach may offer improved consistency compared to stand-alone LLMs. Our findings highlight the transformative potential of AI agents in educational settings while underscoring the need for further research into their interpretability, trustworthiness, and sustainable impact on pedagogical impact.
Study at a glance
  • Question: How can AI agents be used in education, and what are their benefits, applications, and challenges?
  • Setting and data: Not stated in the abstract
  • Method: Review of AI agent approaches and a proof-of-concept demonstration of automated essay scoring
Why it matters

Conventional large language models in education are constrained by their reliance on static training data, limited adaptability, and lack of reasoning. AI agents have emerged to address these limitations and foster more sustainable technological practices.

Key findings
  • In automated essay scoring, systems using multiple AI agents may provide more consistent evaluation than stand-alone language models.
  • Conventional language models in education remain constrained by static training data, limited adaptability, and an absence of reasoning abilities.
  • Educational AI agents can overcome standard model limitations through reflection, planning, tool use, and multi-agent collaboration.

Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

Who is the user?