Date
Publisher
arXiv
Artificial intelligence simultaneously transforms human capital production in
schools and its demand in labor markets. Analyzing these effects in isolation
can lead to a significant misallocation of educational resources. We model an
educational planner whose decision to adopt AI is driven by its teaching
productivity, failing to internalize AI's future wage-suppressing effect on
those same skills. Our core assumption, motivated by a pilot survey, is that
there is a positive correlation between these two effects. This drives our
central proposition: this information failure creates a skill mismatch that
monotonically increases with AI prevalence. Extensions show the mismatch is
exacerbated by the neglect of unpriced non-cognitive skills and by a school's
endogenous over-investment in AI. Our findings caution that policies promoting
AI in education, if not paired with forward-looking labor market signals, may
paradoxically undermine students' long-term human capital, especially if
reliance on AI crowds out the development of unpriced non-cognitive skills,
such as persistence, that are forged through intellectual struggle.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
