Date
Publisher
arXiv
This paper proposes an approach to the responsible adoption of generative AI in higher education, employing a ''points to consider'' approach that is sensitive to the goals, values, and structural features of higher education. Higher education's ethos of collaborative faculty governance, pedagogical and research goals, and embrace of academic freedom conflict, the paper argues, with centralized top down approaches to governing AI that are common in the private sector. The paper is based on a semester long effort at the University of Pittsburgh which gathered and organized perspectives on generative AI in higher education through a collaborative, iterative, interdisciplinary process that included recurring group discussions, three standalone focus groups, and an informal survey. The paper presents insights drawn from this effort that give rise to the ''points to consider'' approach the paper develops. These insights include the benefits and risks of potential uses of generative AI In higher education, as well as barriers to its adoption, and culminate in the six normative points to consider when adopting and governing generative AI in institutions of higher education.
Study at a glance
- Question: How can higher education institutions responsibly adopt and govern generative AI based on faculty perspectives?
- Setting and data: University of Pittsburgh, faculty perspectives collected during a semester-long effort.
- Method: Recurring group discussions, three standalone focus groups, and an informal survey.
Why it matters
Centralized, top-down approaches to governing AI common in the private sector conflict with higher education's ethos of collaborative faculty governance, pedagogical and research goals, and academic freedom.
Key findings
- At the University of Pittsburgh, centralized, top-down artificial intelligence governance conflicts with academic freedom, collaborative faculty governance, and educational goals.
- Faculty perspectives revealed distinct benefits and risks of potential generative artificial intelligence uses, alongside institutional barriers to adoption.
- A framework of six considerations aligns the adoption and governance of generative artificial intelligence with higher education's unique values and structures.
Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design

