Search and Filter

Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

A Principled Way To Think About AI In Education: Guidance For Educators And Policy Makers On Action Based On Goals, Models Of Human Learning, And Use Of Technologies

Date
Publisher
arXiv
The rapid emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and related technologies has the potential to dramatically influence higher education, raising questions about the roles of institutions, educators, and students in a technology-rich future. While existing discourse often emphasizes either the promise and peril of AI or its immediate implementation, this paper advances a third path: a principled framework for guiding the use of AI in teaching and learning. Drawing on decades of scholarship in the learning sciences and uses of technology in education, I articulate a set of principles that connect broad educational goals to actionable practices. These principles clarify the respective roles of educators, learners, and technologies in shaping curricula, designing instruction, assessing learning, and cultivating community. The piece illustrates how a principled approach enables higher education to harness new tools while preserving its fundamental mission: advancing meaningful learning, supporting democratic societies, and preparing students for dynamic futures. Ultimately, this framework seeks to ensure that AI augments rather than displaces human capacities, aligning technology use with enduring educational values and goals. It is meant as a practical guide for anyone engaging in the use of new technology tools in their educational practices, or those people setting educational policies in the modern era. A new preamble (Jul 2026) and modest updates throughout the paper contextualize it since initial sharing (Jul 2025). The good news is that the arguments and principles of action posted originally appear to still be relevant one year later
Study at a glance
  • Question: What principles should guide educators and policymakers when integrating artificial intelligence into teaching and learning?
  • Setting and data: Not stated in the paper
  • Method: Conceptual / policy analysis
Why it matters

The rapid emergence of generative artificial intelligence raises questions about the roles of institutions, educators, and students in higher education, requiring guiding principles to align technology use with enduring educational values.

Key findings
  • Educational goals must explicitly prioritize developing individual capacities and societal infrastructure over mere workforce preparation when deploying artificial intelligence tools.
  • Higher education requires deliberate decisions about which teaching and learning practices must remain human-directed versus those safe or feasible to delegate to technology.
  • Without proactive institutional guidance and training, access to artificial intelligence may shift focus toward performance shortcuts rather than deep learning and higher-order skills.

Summary drafted with AI from the full paper and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

Who is the user?
Who age?