Search and Filter

Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

Tell Me Why: Designing An Explainable LLM-Based Dialogue System For Student Problem Behavior Diagnosis

Date
Publisher
arXiv
Diagnosing student problem behaviors requires teachers to synthesize multifaceted information, identify behavioral categories, and plan intervention strategies. Although fine-tuned large language models (LLMs) can support this process through multi-turn dialogue, they rarely explain why a strategy is recommended, limiting transparency and teachers' trust. To address this issue, we present an explainable dialogue system built on a fine-tuned LLM. The system uses a hierarchical attribution method based on explainable AI (xAI) to identify dialogue evidence for each recommendation and generate a natural-language explanation based on that evidence. In technical evaluation, the method outperformed baseline approaches in identifying supporting evidence. In a preliminary user study with 22 pre-service teachers, participants who received explanations reported higher trust in the system. These findings suggest a promising direction for improving LLM explainability in educational dialogue systems.
Study at a glance
  • Question: Can an explainable dialogue system identify supporting evidence for recommended behavior interventions and increase teachers' trust?
  • Setting and data: Benchmark corpus of 4,045 diagnostic dialogue examples, plus a user study with 22 pre-service teachers.
  • Method: Benchmark model evaluation and a randomized user experiment with pre- and post-test trust surveys.
Why it matters

Although fine-tuned language models can help teachers diagnose student problem behaviors, they rarely explain why strategies are recommended. Because teachers are professionally accountable, this lack of explanation may limit their trust and adoption.

Key findings
  • The hierarchical attribution method outperformed four baselines, correctly identifying the supporting dialogue sentence in 77.8% of cases (Hit@1 of 0.778).
  • Pre-service teachers who received explanations showed a statistically significant increase in trust, whereas the control group without explanations showed no significant change.
  • Changes in trust scores differed significantly between groups, indicating larger trust gains when intervention recommendations were paired with explanations.

Summary drafted with AI from the full paper and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

What is the application?
Who is the user?