Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

A large language model-assisted education tool to provide feedback on open-ended responses

Authors
Jordan K. Matelsky,
Felipe Parodi,
Tony Liu,
Richard D. Lange,
Konrad P. Kording
Date
Publisher
arXiv
Open-ended questions are a favored tool among instructors for assessing student understanding and encouraging critical exploration of course material. Providing feedback for such responses is a time-consuming task that can lead to overwhelmed instructors and decreased feedback quality. Many instructors resort to simpler question formats, like multiple-choice questions, which provide immediate feedback but at the expense of personalized and insightful comments. Here, we present a tool that uses large language models (LLMs), guided by instructor-defined criteria, to automate responses to open-ended questions. Our tool delivers rapid personalized feedback, enabling students to quickly test their knowledge and identify areas for improvement. We provide open-source reference implementations both as a web application and as a Jupyter Notebook widget that can be used with instructional coding or math notebooks. With instructor guidance, LLMs hold promise to enhance student learning outcomes and elevate instructional methodologies.
Study at a glance
  • Question: How can artificial intelligence help provide fast, personalized feedback on students' open-ended answers?
  • Setting and data: Not stated in the abstract
  • Method: Software tool design and development
Why it matters

Providing feedback on open-ended questions is time-consuming, which can overwhelm instructors and reduce feedback quality. As a result, many resort to simpler multiple-choice formats at the expense of personalized and insightful comments.

Key findings
  • An automated AI tool guided by instructor criteria delivers rapid, personalized feedback on open-ended questions, enabling students to quickly identify areas for improvement.
  • The feedback tool operates as both a web application and an interactive widget designed for instructional coding and math notebooks.
  • When guided by instructors, large language models hold promise to enhance student learning outcomes and elevate teaching methods.

Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

What is the application?
Who is the user?