Date
Publisher
arXiv
Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping higher education, yet current
debates often feel tangled, mixing concerns about pedagogy, operations,
curriculum, and the future of work without a shared framework. This paper
offers a first attempt at a taxonomy to organize the diverse narratives of AI
education and to inform discipline-based curricular discussions. We place these
narratives within the enduring responsibility of higher education: the mission
of knowledge. This mission includes not only the preservation and advancement
of disciplinary expertise, but also the cultivation of skills and wisdom, i.e.,
forms of meta-knowledge that encompass judgment, ethics, and social
responsibility. For the purpose of this paper's discussion, AI is defined as
adaptive, data-driven systems that automate analysis, modeling, and
decision-making, highlighting its dual role as enabler and disruptor across
disciplines. We argue that the most consequential challenges lie at the level
of curriculum and disciplinary purpose, where AI accelerates inquiry but also
unsettles expertise and identity. We show how disciplines evolve through the
interplay of research, curriculum, pedagogy, and faculty expertise, and why
curricular reform is the central lever for meaningful change. Pedagogical
innovation offers a strategic and accessible entry point, providing actionable
steps that help faculty and students build the expertise needed to engage in
deeper curricular rethinking and disciplinary renewal. Within this framing, we
suggest that meaningful reform can move forward through structured faculty
journeys: from AI literacy to pedagogy, curriculum design, and research
integration. The key is to align these journeys with the mission of knowledge,
turning the disruptive pressures of AI into opportunities for disciplines to
sustain expertise, advance inquiry, and serve society.
What is the application?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
