Date
Publisher
arXiv
Despite the widespread integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools in higher education, there is limited empirical insight into students' experiences, competences, and readiness to adopt personalized AI companions. To address this gap, this study investigates three key questions: (RQ1) What are students' prior experiences with AI tools, their perceived digital and AI-related competences, and their interest in emerging technologies?; (RQ2) How do students perceive a hypothetical "AI Buddy" (a digital companion designed to support students throughout their academic journey) including adoption, benefits, and concerns?; (RQ3) How does students' willingness to adopt an AI Buddy relate to motivations for engaging in traditional academic activities? Based on a survey of 926 students at a Swiss university, students revealed widespread prior use of AI, primarily for text-based and productivity tasks, with moderate self-assessed digital competence. Students expressed strong enthusiasm for adopting an AI Buddy, valuing its potential for time efficiency, personalized academic support, and study organization, but expressed significant concerns about data privacy and over-reliance. A weak negative correlation emerged between AI Buddy adoption willingness and motivations for attending lectures or using library resources, while social and collaborative motivations remained unaffected. These findings suggest that AI Buddies may partially replace information-seeking behaviours but preserve the social fabric of university life. This study provides practical recommendations including the need for robust privacy protections and critical engagement strategies to ensure AI Buddies enhance, rather than undermine, the academic and communal value of higher education.
Study at a glance
- Question: How do university students perceive personal AI study companions, and how does willingness to adopt them relate to campus engagement?
- Setting and data: University of Zurich, Switzerland; survey of 926 university students across seven faculties; April 2024.
- Method: Cross-sectional survey with descriptive statistics, correlation analyses, ANOVA, and automated text analysis.
Why it matters
Despite the widespread integration of generative AI tools, empirical evidence is limited regarding students' readiness to adopt personalized AI companions and how this adoption may affect their engagement in traditional academic activities.
Key findings
- Most surveyed students reported prior AI use (96.9%) and showed positive interest in an AI Buddy (mean 4.79 out of 7), primarily valuing time efficiency and study support.
- Higher willingness to adopt an AI Buddy had weak negative correlations with motivation to visit lectures (r = -0.084) and consult library books (r = -0.105).
- Willingness to adopt an AI Buddy showed no significant relationship with students' motivations for campus social or collaborative activities, such as seminars or peer studying.
Summary drafted with AI from the full paper and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
