Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

Evaluating GenAI for Simplifying Texts for Education: Improving Accuracy and Consistency for Enhanced Readability

Authors
Stephanie L. Day,
Jacapo Cirica,
Steven R. Clapp,
Veronika Penkova,
Amy E. Giroux,
Abbey Banta,
Catherine Bordeau,
Poojitha Mutteneni,
Ben D. Sawyer
Date
Publisher
arXiv
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) holds great promise as a tool to support personalized learning. Teachers need tools to efficiently and effectively enhance content readability of educational texts so that they are matched to individual students reading levels, while retaining key details. Large Language Models (LLMs) show potential to fill this need, but previous research notes multiple shortcomings in current approaches. In this study, we introduced a generalized approach and metrics for the systematic evaluation of the accuracy and consistency in which LLMs, prompting techniques, and a novel multi-agent architecture to simplify sixty informational reading passages, reducing each from the twelfth grade level down to the eighth, sixth, and fourth grade levels. We calculated the degree to which each LLM and prompting technique accurately achieved the targeted grade level for each passage, percentage change in word count, and consistency in maintaining keywords and key phrases (semantic similarity). One-sample t-tests and multiple regression models revealed significant differences in the best performing LLM and prompt technique for each of the four metrics. Both LLMs and prompting techniques demonstrated variable utility in grade level accuracy and consistency of keywords and key phrases when attempting to level content down to the fourth grade reading level. These results demonstrate the promise of the application of LLMs for efficient and precise automated text simplification, the shortcomings of current models and prompting methods in attaining an ideal balance across various evaluation criteria, and a generalizable method to evaluate future systems.
Study at a glance
  • Question: How accurately can AI simplify reading texts to lower grade levels while keeping key information?
  • Setting and data: 60 informational reading passages reduced from twelfth-grade level to eighth-, sixth-, and fourth-grade levels.
  • Method: Tests how accurately different AI models and prompting techniques simplify texts to specific grade levels.
Why it matters

Teachers need tools to efficiently enhance text readability to match individual students' reading levels while retaining key details. While large language models show potential to fill this need, previous research notes multiple shortcomings in current approaches.

Key findings
  • When simplifying 60 twelfth-grade reading passages to lower grade levels, language models differed significantly in grade-level accuracy and retaining key phrases.
  • Language models and prompts showed inconsistent accuracy and struggled to preserve essential keywords when simplifying texts down to a fourth-grade reading level.
  • Current AI models and prompting methods struggle to balance targeted reading-level accuracy, passage length, and preserving essential content.

Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

What is the application?
Who is the user?