Date
Publisher
arXiv
As generative AI becomes part of everyday writing, questions of transparency
and productive human effort are increasingly important. Educators, reviewers,
and readers want to understand how AI shaped the process. Where was human
effort focused? What role did AI play in the creation of the work? How did the
interaction unfold? Existing approaches often reduce these dynamics to summary
metrics or simplified provenance. We introduce DraftMarks, an augmented reading
tool that surfaces the human-AI writing process through familiar physical
metaphors. DraftMarks employs skeuomorphic encodings such as eraser crumbs to
convey the intensity of revision, and masking tape or smudges to mark
AI-generated content, simulating the process within the final written artifact.
By using data from writer-AI interactions, DraftMarks' algorithm computes
various collaboration metrics and writing traces. Through a formative study, we
identified computational logic for different readership, and evaluated
DraftMarks for its effectiveness in assessing AI co-authored writing.
What is the application?
Who age?
Why use AI?
