Date
Publisher
arXiv
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) of large language models (LLMs) for specialized tasks requires high-quality datasets, but manual curation is prohibitively expensive. Synthetic data generation offers scalability, but its effectiveness relies on complex, multi-stage workflows, integrating prompt engineering and model orchestration. Existing automated workflow methods face a cold start problem: they require labeled datasets for reward modeling, which is especially problematic for subjective, open-ended tasks with no objective ground truth. We introduce AutoSynth, a framework that automates workflow discovery and optimization without reference datasets by reframing the problem as a Monte Carlo Tree Search guided by a novel dataset-free hybrid reward. This reward enables meta-learning through two LLM-as-judge components: one evaluates sample quality using dynamically generated task-specific metrics, and another assesses workflow code and prompt quality. Experiments on subjective educational tasks show that while expert-designed workflows achieve higher human preference rates (96-99% win rates vs. AutoSynth's 40-51%), models trained on AutoSynth-generated data dramatically outperform baselines (40-51% vs. 2-5%) and match or surpass expert workflows on certain metrics, suggesting discovery of quality dimensions beyond human intuition. These results are achieved while reducing human effort from 5-7 hours to just 30 minutes (>90% reduction). AutoSynth tackles the cold start issue in data-centric AI, offering a scalable, cost-effective method for subjective LLM tasks. Code: https://github.com/bisz9918-maker/AutoSynth.
Study at a glance
- Question: Can an automated tool create high-quality training data for educational AI models without relying on human-labeled examples?
- Setting and data: Not stated in the abstract
- Method: Computational experiment comparing an automated data generation system against expert-designed workflows and baselines.
Why it matters
Fine-tuning language models for specialized tasks requires high-quality datasets, but manual curation is prohibitively expensive. Existing automated methods require labeled datasets, which is especially problematic for subjective, open-ended tasks with no objective ground truth.
Key findings
- In subjective educational tasks, models trained on automatically generated data outperformed baselines and matched or exceeded expert-designed workflows on certain metrics.
- The automated system cut human effort by over 90 percent, reducing preparation time from five to seven hours to only 30 minutes.
- Human evaluators still preferred expert-designed workflows over the automated tool, choosing expert materials 96 to 99 percent of the time.
Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Study design
