Date
Publisher
arXiv
Integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) into educational practice enables
personalized learning by accommodating diverse learner behaviors. This study
explored diverse learner profiles within a multi-agent, LLM-empowered learning
environment. Data was collected from 312 undergraduate students at a university
in China as they participated in a six-module course. Based on hierarchical
cluster analyses of system profiles and student-AI interactive dialogues, we
found that students exhibit varied behavioral, cognitive, and emotional
engagement tendencies. This analysis allowed us to identify two types of
dropouts (early dropouts and stagnating interactors) and three completer
profiles (active questioners, responsive navigators, and lurkers). The results
showed that high levels of interaction do not always equate to productive
learning and vice versa. Prior knowledge significantly influenced interaction
patterns and short-term learning benefits. Further analysis of the human-AI
dialogues revealed that some students actively engaged in knowledge
construction, while others displayed a high frequency of regulatory behaviors.
Notably, both groups of students achieved comparable learning gains,
demonstrating the effectiveness of the multi-agent learning environment in
supporting personalized learning. These results underscore the complex and
multifaceted nature of engagement in human-AI collaborative learning and
provide practical implications for the design of adaptive educational systems.
Study at a glance
- Question: How do students interact and engage with AI in an AI-powered learning environment?
- Setting and data: 312 undergraduate students participating in a six-module course at a university in China
- Method: Analysis of system profiles and student-AI conversation logs (hierarchical cluster analyses)
Why it matters
Integrating Large Language Models into educational practice enables personalized learning by accommodating diverse learner behaviors.
Key findings
- Among 312 Chinese undergraduates using an AI learning environment, high levels of interaction did not always equate to productive learning.
- Students exhibited two distinct dropout profiles and three completer profiles based on their varied engagement with the AI.
- Students actively constructing knowledge and those displaying frequent regulatory behaviors achieved comparable learning gains.
Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
