Date
Publisher
arXiv
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shifted in just a few years from novelty to
ubiquity, raising fundamental questions for data science education. Tasks once
used to teach coding, writing, and problem-solving can now be completed by
LLMs, forcing educators to reconsider both pedagogy and assessment. To
understand how instructors are adapting, we conducted semi-structured
interviews with 42 instructors from 33 institutions in 10 countries in June and
July 2025. Our qualitative analysis reveals a pragmatic mix of optimism and
concern. Many respondents view LLMs as inevitable classroom tools -- comparable
to calculators or Wikipedia -- while others worry about de-skilling, misplaced
confidence, and uneven integration across institutions. Around 58 per cent have
already introduced demonstrations, guided activities, or make extensive use of
LLMs in their courses, though most expect change to remain slow and uneven.
That said, 31 per cent have not used LLMs to teach students and do not plan to.
We highlight some instructional innovations, including AI-aware assessments,
reflective use of LLMs as tutors, and course-specific chatbots. By sharing
these perspectives, we aim to help data science educators adapt collectively to
ensure curricula keep pace with technological change.
Study at a glance
- Question: How are data science instructors adapting their teaching and assessments to large language models?
- Setting and data: 42 instructors from 33 institutions across 10 countries, June and July 2025.
- Method: Semi-structured interviews
Why it matters
Large language models can now complete tasks once used to teach coding, writing, and problem-solving, forcing educators to reconsider pedagogy and assessment. Understanding instructor perspectives helps ensure data science curricula keep pace with technological change.
Key findings
- Among 42 college data science instructors across 10 countries, about 58 percent have introduced AI demonstrations, guided activities, or extensive coursework.
- Instructors viewed AI as inevitable like calculators, but voiced concerns about student de-skilling, misplaced confidence, and uneven integration across institutions.
- Thirty-one percent of instructors have not used AI to teach students and do not plan to adopt it.
Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design

