Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

Predicting Long-Term Student Outcomes from Short-Term EdTech Log Data

Authors
Ge Gao,
Amelia Leon,
Andrea Jetten,
Jasmine Turner,
Husni Almoubayyed,
Stephen Fancsali,
Emma Brunskill
Date
Publisher
arXiv
Educational stakeholders are often particularly interested in sparse, delayed student outcomes, like end-of-year statewide exams. The rare occurrence of such assessments makes it harder to identify students likely to fail such assessments, as well as making it slow for researchers and educators to be able to assess the effectiveness of particular educational tools. Prior work has primarily focused on using logs from students full usage (e.g. year-long) of an educational product to predict outcomes, or considered predictive accuracy using a few minutes to predict outcomes after a short (e.g. 1 hour) session. In contrast, we investigate machine learning predictors using students' logs during their first few hours of usage can provide useful predictive insight into those students' end-of-school year external assessment. We do this on three diverse datasets: from students in Uganda using a literacy game product, and from students in the US using two mathematics intelligent tutoring systems. We consider various measures of the accuracy of the resulting predictors, including its ability to identify students at different parts along the assessment performance distribution. Our findings suggest that short-term log usage data, from 2-5 hours, can be used to provide valuable signal about students' long-term external performance.
Study at a glance
  • Question: Can students' first few hours of educational software use predict their end-of-year exam scores?
  • Setting and data: Students in Uganda using a literacy game and students in the US using two math intelligent tutoring systems.
  • Method: Tests machine learning models predicting end-of-year exam performance from students' first few hours of software usage logs.
Why it matters

The rare occurrence of end-of-year exams makes it harder to identify students likely to fail and slows evaluations of educational tools. Prior work has primarily relied on full-year logs or brief sessions to predict student outcomes.

Key findings
  • In literacy and math software across Uganda and the US, two to five hours of usage provided valuable signals predicting year-end exam performance.
  • The predictive models successfully identified students at different points across the full end-of-year assessment performance distribution.
  • Machine learning tools provided useful predictive insights into delayed external exam results using only students' first few hours of software use.

Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

What is the application?
Who is the user?