Search and Filter

Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

Multiple-Choice Question Generation Using Large Language Models: Methodology and Educator Insights

Authors
Giorgio Biancini,
Alessio Ferrato,
Carla Limongelli
Date
Publisher
arXiv
Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) in educational settings has brought new learning approaches, transforming the practices of both students and educators. Among the various technologies driving this transformation, Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for creating educational materials and question answering, but there are still space for new applications. Educators commonly use Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs) to assess student knowledge, but manually generating these questions is resource-intensive and requires significant time and cognitive effort. In our opinion, LLMs offer a promising solution to these challenges. This paper presents a novel comparative analysis of three widely known LLMs - Llama 2, Mistral, and GPT-3.5 - to explore their potential for creating informative and challenging MCQs. In our approach, we do not rely on the knowledge of the LLM, but we inject the knowledge into the prompt to contrast the hallucinations, giving the educators control over the test's source text, too. Our experiment involving 21 educators shows that GPT-3.5 generates the most effective MCQs across several known metrics. Additionally, it shows that there is still some reluctance to adopt AI in the educational field. This study sheds light on the potential of LLMs to generate MCQs and improve the educational experience, providing valuable insights for the future.
Study at a glance
  • Question: How well can different AI models generate multiple-choice questions for educators?
  • Setting and data: 21 educators.
  • Method: Experiment comparing multiple-choice questions generated by three AI models and evaluated by educators.
Why it matters

Educators commonly use multiple-choice questions to assess student knowledge, but manually generating them is resource-intensive and requires significant time and cognitive effort. Large language models offer a promising solution to these challenges.

Key findings
  • In an experiment with 21 educators, GPT-3.5 generated the most effective multiple-choice questions compared to other tested language models.
  • Educators showed continued reluctance toward adopting artificial intelligence in the educational field.
  • Large language models demonstrated the capacity to create informative and challenging multiple-choice questions for assessing student knowledge.

Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

What is the application?
Who is the user?