Date
Publisher
arXiv
Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) in educational settings has brought
new learning approaches, transforming the practices of both students and
educators. Among the various technologies driving this transformation, Large
Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for creating educational
materials and question answering, but there are still space for new
applications. Educators commonly use Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs) to assess
student knowledge, but manually generating these questions is
resource-intensive and requires significant time and cognitive effort. In our
opinion, LLMs offer a promising solution to these challenges. This paper
presents a novel comparative analysis of three widely known LLMs - Llama 2,
Mistral, and GPT-3.5 - to explore their potential for creating informative and
challenging MCQs. In our approach, we do not rely on the knowledge of the LLM,
but we inject the knowledge into the prompt to contrast the hallucinations,
giving the educators control over the test's source text, too. Our experiment
involving 21 educators shows that GPT-3.5 generates the most effective MCQs
across several known metrics. Additionally, it shows that there is still some
reluctance to adopt AI in the educational field. This study sheds light on the
potential of LLMs to generate MCQs and improve the educational experience,
providing valuable insights for the future.
Study at a glance
- Question: How well can different AI models generate multiple-choice questions for educators?
- Setting and data: 21 educators.
- Method: Experiment comparing multiple-choice questions generated by three AI models and evaluated by educators.
Why it matters
Educators commonly use multiple-choice questions to assess student knowledge, but manually generating them is resource-intensive and requires significant time and cognitive effort. Large language models offer a promising solution to these challenges.
Key findings
- In an experiment with 21 educators, GPT-3.5 generated the most effective multiple-choice questions compared to other tested language models.
- Educators showed continued reluctance toward adopting artificial intelligence in the educational field.
- Large language models demonstrated the capacity to create informative and challenging multiple-choice questions for assessing student knowledge.
Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
