Search and Filter

Large Language Models In Teaching And Learning: Reflections On Implementing An AI Chatbot In Higher Education

Date

AI Overview

Why it matters

Although large language models offer substantial opportunities in Higher Education, their tendency to hallucinate and their limited specialized knowledge present risks, while real-world evidence validating their integration into authentic educational settings remains scarce.

Study at a glance
  • Question: How do students perceive interacting with an AI chatbot compared to a human teacher in a course audit exercise?
  • Setting and data: Master's degree engineering course at the Technical University of Denmark, spring 2024 to fall 2025, 70 students across three cohorts.
  • Method: Mixed methods iterative evaluation including student surveys, thematic feedback analysis, grade comparisons, and a crossover study.
  • AI tools: ChatGMP, FLAN-T5 base, LLaMA 2
Key findings
  • Students using the chatbot reported less stress than interviewing teachers and valued receiving conversation transcripts, but experienced students in the crossover study preferred human teachers.
  • Student satisfaction with the chatbot improved between 2024 and 2025, with 78% of 2025 chatbot users viewing AI as the future of the exercise.
  • Students who audited the chatbot had slightly lower average final course grades than the overall class average in both 2024 and 2025.

Summary drafted with AI from the full paper and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

The landscape of education is changing rapidly, shaped by emerging pedagogical approaches, technological innovations such as artificial intelligence (AI), and evolving societal expectations, all of which demand thorough evaluation of new educational tools. Although large language models (LLMs) present substantial opportunities especially in Higher Education, their propensity to generate hallucinations and their limited specialized knowledge may introduce significant risks. This study aims to address these risks by examining the practical implementation of an LLM-enhanced assistant in a university level course. We implemented a generative AI assistant grounded in a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) model to replicate a previously teacher-led, time-intensive exercise. To assess the effectiveness of the LLM, we conducted three separate experiments through iterative mixed-methods approaches, including a crossover design. The resulting data address central research questions related to student motivation, perceived differences between engaging with the LLM versus a human teacher, the quality of AI-generated responses, and the impact of the LLM on students' academic performance. The results offer direct insights into students' views and the pedagogical feasibility of embedding LLMs into specialized courses. Finally, we discuss the main challenges, opportunities and future directions of LLMs in teaching and learning in Higher Education.