Date
Publisher
arXiv
Student modeling is central to many educational technologies as it enables
predicting future learning outcomes and designing targeted instructional
strategies. However, open-ended learning domains pose challenges for accurately
modeling students due to the diverse behaviors and a large space of possible
misconceptions. To approach these challenges, we explore the application of
large language models (LLMs) for in-context student modeling in open-ended
learning domains. More concretely, given a particular student's attempt on a
reference task as observation, the objective is to synthesize the student's
attempt on a target task. We introduce a novel framework, LLM for Student
Synthesis (LLM-SS), that leverages LLMs for synthesizing a student's behavior.
Our framework can be combined with different LLMs; moreover, we fine-tune LLMs
to boost their student modeling capabilities. We instantiate several methods
based on LLM-SS framework and evaluate them using an existing benchmark,
StudentSyn, for student attempt synthesis in a visual programming domain.
Experimental results show that our methods perform significantly better than
the baseline method NeurSS provided in the StudentSyn benchmark. Furthermore,
our method using a fine-tuned version of the GPT-3.5 model is significantly
better than using the base GPT-3.5 model and gets close to human tutors'
performance.
Study at a glance
- Question: Can large language models predict a student's attempt on a new programming task based on a previous attempt?
- Setting and data: Student attempts in a visual programming domain from an existing dataset (StudentSyn).
- Method: Tests how well AI models predict student attempts compared to an existing baseline model.
Why it matters
Student modeling helps educational technologies predict learning outcomes and design targeted instructional strategies. However, accurately modeling students in open-ended learning domains is challenging due to diverse behaviors and a large space of possible misconceptions.
Key findings
- In visual programming, language models predicted students' future task attempts based on prior work significantly better than an existing baseline method.
- Specifically training the language model on student behavior yielded significantly better predictions than using the standard base model.
- The specifically trained model predicted student task attempts nearly as accurately as human tutors.
Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Why use AI?
Study design
