Date
Publisher
arXiv
Preparing high-quality instructional materials remains a labor-intensive
process that often requires extensive coordination among teaching faculty,
instructional designers, and teaching assistants. In this work, we present
Instructional Agents, a multi-agent large language model (LLM) framework
designed to automate end-to-end course material generation, including syllabus
creation, lecture scripts, LaTeX-based slides, and assessments. Unlike existing
AI-assisted educational tools that focus on isolated tasks, Instructional
Agents simulates role-based collaboration among educational agents to produce
cohesive and pedagogically aligned content. The system operates in four modes:
Autonomous, Catalog-Guided, Feedback-Guided, and Full Co-Pilot mode, enabling
flexible control over the degree of human involvement. We evaluate
Instructional Agents across five university-level computer science courses and
show that it produces high-quality instructional materials while significantly
reducing development time and human workload. By supporting institutions with
limited instructional design capacity, Instructional Agents provides a scalable
and cost-effective framework to democratize access to high-quality education,
particularly in underserved or resource-constrained settings.
Study at a glance
- Question: Can a system of AI tools automatically generate complete, high-quality instructional materials for courses?
- Setting and data: Five university-level computer science courses.
- Method: Evaluation of an automated instructional design system across five courses.
Why it matters
Preparing high-quality instructional materials remains a labor-intensive process requiring extensive coordination among teaching faculty, instructional designers, and assistants. Additionally, existing AI-assisted educational tools focus on isolated tasks rather than end-to-end generation.
Key findings
- Across five university-level computer science courses, the multi-agent system produced high-quality instructional materials while significantly reducing development time and educator workload.
- The AI tool generated cohesive and pedagogically aligned materials spanning entire courses, including syllabi, lecture scripts, slides, and assessments.
- The system allowed educators to flexibly control human involvement using four modes, ranging from fully autonomous to collaborative co-pilot generation.
Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Why use AI?
