Search and Filter

Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

How Should Al Knowledge Be Governed? Epistemic Authority, Structural Transparency, And The Case For Open Cognitive Graphs

Date
Publisher
arXiv
Through widespread use in formative assessment and self-directed learning, educational AI systems exercise de facto epistemic authority. Unlike human educators, however, these systems are not embedded in institutional mechanisms of accountability, review, and correction, creating a structural governance challenge that cannot be resolved through application-level regulation or model transparency alone. This paper reconceptualizes educational AI as public educational cognitive infrastructure and argues that its governance must address the epistemic authority such systems exert. We propose the Open Cognitive Graph (OCG) as a technical interface that externalizes pedagogical structure in forms aligned with human educational reasoning. By explicitly representing concepts, prerequisite relations, misconceptions, and scaffolding, OCGs make the cognitive logic governing AI behaviour inspectable and revisable. Building on this foundation, we introduce the trunk-branch governance model, which organizes epistemic authority across layers of consensus and pluralism. A case study of a community-governed educational foundation model demonstrates how distributed expertise can be integrated through institutionalized processes of validation, correction, and propagation. The paper concludes by discussing implications for educational equity, AI policy, and sustainability. By shifting attention from access to governance conditions, the proposed framework offers a structural approach to aligning educational AI with democratic accountability and public responsibility.
Study at a glance
  • Question: How should the pedagogical knowledge and authority embedded in educational AI systems be governed?
  • Setting and data: Envisioned case study of a community-governed foundation model for introductory science education.
  • Method: Conceptual analysis and an envisioned case study.
Why it matters

Educational AI systems make authoritative pedagogical judgments at scale but lack the accountability, review, and correction mechanisms that traditionally constrain human educators.

Key findings
  • Open Cognitive Graphs externalize pedagogical assumptions into inspectable, revisable structures to govern AI behavior beyond parameter-level transparency.
  • A trunk-branch governance model balances epistemic stability through a consensus trunk layer with pluralism through community-maintained local branches.
  • A case study indicates that distributed educators and researchers can identify pedagogical flaws, validate intermediate scaffolds, and propagate corrections across shared infrastructure.

Summary drafted with AI from the full paper and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

Who is the user?
Why use AI?