Search and Filter

Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

From First Draft to Final Insight: A Multi-Agent Approach for Feedback Generation

Authors
Jie Cao,
Chloe Qianhui Zhao,
Xian Chen,
Shuman Wang,
Christian Schunn,
Kenneth R. Koedinger,
Jionghao Lin
Date
Publisher
arXiv
Producing large volumes of high-quality, timely feedback poses significant challenges to instructors. To address this issue, automation technologies particularly Large Language Models (LLMs) show great potential. However, current LLM-based research still shows room for improvement in terms of feedback quality. Our study proposed a multi-agent approach performing ígeneration, evaluation, and regeneration (G-E-RG) to further enhance feedback quality. In the first-generation phase, six methods were adopted, combining three feedback theoretical frameworks and two prompt methods: zero-shot and retrieval-augmented generation with chain-of-thought (RAG_CoT). The results indicated that, compared to first-round feedback, G-E-RG significantly improved final feedback across six methods for most dimensions. Specifically:(1) Evaluation accuracy for six methods increased by 3.36% to 12.98% (p < 0.001); (2) The proportion of feedback containing four effective components rose from an average of 27.72% to an average of 98.49% among six methods, sub-dimensions of providing critiques, highlighting strengths, encouraging agency, and cultivating dialogue also showed great enhancement (p < 0.001); (3) There was a significant improvement in most of the feature values (p < 0.001), although some sub-dimensions (e.g., strengthening the teacher-student relationship) still require further enhancement; (4) The simplicity of feedback was effectively enhanced (p < 0.001) for three methods.
What is the application?
Who age?