Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

Feedback That Clicks: Introductory Physics Students' Valued Features in AI Feedback Generated From Self-Crafted and Engineered Prompts

Authors
Amogh Sirnoorkar,
N. Sanjay Rebello
Date
Publisher
arXiv
Since the advent of GPT-3.5 in 2022, Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has shown tremendous potential in STEM education, particularly in providing real-time, customized feedback to students in large-enrollment courses. A crucial skill that mediates effective use of AI is the systematic structuring of natural language instructions to AI models, commonly referred to as prompt engineering. This study has three objectives: (i) to investigate the sophistication of student-generated prompts when seeking feedback from AI on their arguments, (ii) to examine the features that students value in AI-generated feedback, and (iii) to analyze trends in student preferences for feedback generated from self-crafted prompts versus prompts incorporating prompt engineering techniques and principles of effective feedback. Results indicate that student-generated prompts typically reflect only a subset of foundational prompt engineering techniques. Despite this lack of sophistication, such as incomplete descriptions of task context, AI responses demonstrated contextual intuitiveness by accurately inferring context from the overall content of the prompt. We also identified 12 distinct features that students attribute the usefulness of AI-generated feedback, spanning four broader themes: Evaluation, Content, Presentation, and Depth. Finally, results show that students overwhelmingly prefer feedback generated from structured prompts, particularly those combining prompt engineering techniques with principles of effective feedback. Implications of these results such as integrating the principles of effective feedback in design and delivery of feedback through AI systems, and incorporating prompt engineering in introductory physics courses are discussed.
Study at a glance
  • Question: What do physics students value in AI feedback, and which types of prompts produce feedback they prefer?
  • Setting and data: Introductory physics students
  • Method: Not stated in the abstract
Why it matters

Generative AI has tremendous potential to provide real-time, customized feedback in STEM education. Yet effective use depends on prompt engineering—a crucial skill of systematically structuring instructions to AI models.

Key findings
  • In introductory physics, students overwhelmingly preferred AI feedback generated from structured prompts that combined prompt engineering techniques with principles of effective feedback.
  • Students attributed the usefulness of AI feedback to 12 distinct features spanning four broader themes: evaluation, content, presentation, and depth.
  • Although student-generated prompts typically lacked sophisticated task descriptions, AI tools accurately inferred the context from the prompt's overall content.

Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?