Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

CourseAssist: Pedagogically Appropriate AI Tutor for Computer Science Education

Authors
Ty Feng,
Sa Liu,
Dipak Ghosal
Date
Publisher
arXiv
The growing enrollments in computer science courses and increase in class sizes necessitate scalable, automated tutoring solutions to adequately support student learning. While Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4 have demonstrated potential in assisting students through question-answering, educators express concerns over student overreliance, miscomprehension of generated code, and the risk of inaccurate answers. Rather than banning these tools outright, we advocate for a constructive approach that harnesses the capabilities of AI while mitigating potential risks. This poster introduces CourseAssist, a novel LLM-based tutoring system tailored for computer science education. Unlike generic LLM systems, CourseAssist uses retrieval-augmented generation, user intent classification, and question decomposition to align AI responses with specific course materials and learning objectives, thereby ensuring pedagogical appropriateness of LLMs in educational settings. We evaluated CourseAssist against a baseline of GPT-4 using a dataset of 50 question-answer pairs from a programming languages course, focusing on the criteria of usefulness, accuracy, and pedagogical appropriateness. Evaluation results show that CourseAssist significantly outperforms the baseline, demonstrating its potential to serve as an effective learning assistant. We have also deployed CourseAssist in 6 computer science courses at a large public R1 research university reaching over 500 students. Interviews with 20 student users show that CourseAssist improves computer science instruction by increasing the accessibility of course-specific tutoring help and shortening the feedback loop on their programming assignments. Future work will include extensive pilot testing at more universities and exploring better collaborative relationships between students, educators, and AI that improve computer science learning experiences.
Study at a glance
  • Question: Can an AI tutor tailored to course materials provide better, more accurate learning support than a generic AI model?
  • Setting and data: Six computer science courses with over 500 students at a public R1 research university, 50 question-answer pairs, and 20 student interviews.
  • Method: Compares AI tutor responses against a baseline model on course questions, alongside classroom deployment and student interviews.
Why it matters

Growing enrollments in computer science courses necessitate scalable, automated tutoring solutions. While large language models show potential, educators express concerns over student overreliance, miscomprehension of generated code, and the risk of inaccurate answers.

Key findings
  • In six university computer science courses with over 500 students, interviewed learners reported that a tailored AI tutor increased access to course-specific help.
  • Interviewed students also reported that the AI tutor shortened the feedback loop on their programming assignments.
  • The tailored AI tutor significantly outperformed a standard commercial AI model in answer usefulness, accuracy, and educational appropriateness.

Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?