Date
Publisher
arXiv
Project-based learning plays a crucial role in computing education. However,
its open-ended nature makes tracking project development and assessing success
challenging. We investigate how dialogue and system interaction logs predict
project quality during collaborative, project-based AI learning of 94 middle
school students working in pairs. We used linguistic features from dialogue
transcripts and behavioral features from system logs to predict three project
quality outcomes: productivity (number of training phrases), content richness
(word density), and lexical variation (word diversity) of chatbot training
phrases. We compared the predictive accuracy of each modality and a fusion of
the modalities. Results indicate log data better predicts productivity, while
dialogue data is more effective for content richness. Both modalities modestly
predict lexical variation. Multimodal fusion improved predictions for
productivity and lexical variation of training phrases but not content
richness. These findings suggest that the value of multimodal fusion depends on
the specific learning outcome. The study contributes to multimodal learning
analytics by demonstrating the nuanced interplay between behavioral and
linguistic data in assessing student learning progress in open-ended AI
learning environments.
Study at a glance
- Question: Can student dialogue and computer activity logs predict the quality of middle school AI projects?
- Setting and data: 94 middle school students working in pairs during collaborative, project-based AI learning.
- Method: Compares how accurately computer logs, dialogue transcripts, and their combination predict student project quality.
Why it matters
Project-based learning plays a crucial role in computing education. However, its open-ended nature makes tracking project development and assessing success challenging.
Key findings
- Among 94 middle school students in paired AI projects, computer log data better predicted work productivity, while student dialogue better predicted content richness.
- Combining computer logs and dialogue data improved predictions for project productivity and word diversity, but not for content richness.
- Both interaction logs and dialogue data modestly predicted the diversity of words students used in their chatbot projects.
Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
