Search and Filter

Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

Aissa: Implementation And Deployment Of An AI-Based Student Slides Analysis Tool For Academic Presentations

Date
Publisher
arXiv
Providing timely and actionable feedback on oral presentation slides is challenging in higher education, particularly in large classes where teachers cannot realistically deliver detailed formative feedback before students present. This paper introduces AISSA (AI-based Student Slides Analysis tool), a web-based system that combines large language models (LLMs) and Learning Analytics dashboards to support scalable, rubric-based feedback on presentation slides. AISSA allows students to upload their slide decks prior to an oral presentation and automatically receive quantitative scores and qualitative feedback based on teacher-defined evaluation rubrics. The system analyzes both slide-level features and slide content, generates structured feedback through an LLM (ChatGPT 5.2), and presents the results through interactive dashboards for students and teachers. We tested AISSA on a pilot deployment with 46 undergraduate students in a real academic setting. The results indicate that AISSA is technically reliable, economically feasible, and perceived by students as useful for iterative slide improvement. These findings suggest that combining LLM-based analysis with Learning Analytics dashboards is a promising approach for supporting formative feedback on presentation slides at scale.
Study at a glance
  • Question: How reliably, affordably, and effectively can an AI-driven dashboard system deliver rubric-based formative feedback on presentation slides to students?
  • Setting and data: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain; 46 final-year undergraduate telecommunication engineering students; second trimester 2026; 90 slide presentations analyzed.
  • Method: System development and pilot user study with usability surveys and semi-structured interviews (Mixed methods).
Why it matters

Delivering timely, formative feedback on presentation slides is challenging in higher education, especially in large classes where feedback typically arrives too late for students to revise their visual materials before oral presentations.

Key findings
  • Undergraduate students reported high perceived usability, giving the AISSA tool an average System Usability Scale score of 83.38 out of 100.
  • The system operated reliably across 90 presentations with processing times of 1 to 3 minutes and an estimated average cost of $0.06 to $0.07 per evaluation.
  • Interviews revealed students used the tool iteratively to refine slides and praised feedback on font size, visual consistency, and citations, though some selectively ignored recommendations.

Summary drafted with AI from the full paper and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?