Date
Publisher
arXiv
We present a study that translates the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) using
OpenAI GPT-4o and assess the specific difficulties of translating a
scientific-focused topic using Large Language Models (LLMs). The FCI is a
physics exam meant to evaluate outcomes of a student cohort before and after
instruction in Newtonian physics. We examine the problem-solving ability of the
LLM in both the translated document and the translation back into English,
detailing the language-dependent issues that complicate the translation. While
ChatGPT performs remarkably well on answering the questions in both the
translated language as well as the back-translation into English, problems
arise with language-specific nuances and formatting. Pitfalls include words or
phrases that lack one-to-one matching terms in another language, especially
discipline-specific scientific terms, or outright mistranslations. Depending on
the context, these translations can result in a critical change in the physical
meaning of the problem. Additionally, issues with question numbering and
lettering are found in some languages. The issues around the translations of
numbering and lettering provide insight into the abilities of the LLM and
suggest that it is not simply relying upon FCI questions that may have been
part of the LLM training data to provide answers. These findings underscore
that while LLMs can accelerate multilingual access to educational tools,
careful review is still needed to ensure fidelity and clarity in translated
assessments. LLMs provide a new opportunity to expand educational tools and
assessments. At the same time, there are unique challenges using LLMs to
facilitate translations that this case study examines in detail.
Study at a glance
- Question: What challenges arise when using AI to translate physics test questions into other languages?
- Setting and data: The Force Concept Inventory, a Newtonian physics exam.
- Method: Case study evaluating an AI model's translation, back-translation, and problem-solving on physics exam questions.
Why it matters
Large language models offer new opportunities to expand educational tools and assessments across languages. However, translating science-focused topics presents unique challenges and language-dependent issues that complicate translations.
Key findings
- On a Newtonian physics exam, an AI tool answered questions remarkably well across translated languages and when translated back into English.
- AI translations produced mistranslations and lacked exact scientific terms, which sometimes critically changed the physical meaning of the exam problems.
- Numbering and lettering errors in some languages suggest the AI tool was not simply relying on memorized test questions from its training data.
Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
