Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

Translating the Force Concept Inventory in the age of AI

Authors
Marina Babayeva,
Justin Dunlap,
Marie Sn_tinov‡,
Ralf Widenhorn
Date
Publisher
arXiv
We present a study that translates the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) using OpenAI GPT-4o and assess the specific difficulties of translating a scientific-focused topic using Large Language Models (LLMs). The FCI is a physics exam meant to evaluate outcomes of a student cohort before and after instruction in Newtonian physics. We examine the problem-solving ability of the LLM in both the translated document and the translation back into English, detailing the language-dependent issues that complicate the translation. While ChatGPT performs remarkably well on answering the questions in both the translated language as well as the back-translation into English, problems arise with language-specific nuances and formatting. Pitfalls include words or phrases that lack one-to-one matching terms in another language, especially discipline-specific scientific terms, or outright mistranslations. Depending on the context, these translations can result in a critical change in the physical meaning of the problem. Additionally, issues with question numbering and lettering are found in some languages. The issues around the translations of numbering and lettering provide insight into the abilities of the LLM and suggest that it is not simply relying upon FCI questions that may have been part of the LLM training data to provide answers. These findings underscore that while LLMs can accelerate multilingual access to educational tools, careful review is still needed to ensure fidelity and clarity in translated assessments. LLMs provide a new opportunity to expand educational tools and assessments. At the same time, there are unique challenges using LLMs to facilitate translations that this case study examines in detail.
Study at a glance
  • Question: What challenges arise when using AI to translate physics test questions into other languages?
  • Setting and data: The Force Concept Inventory, a Newtonian physics exam.
  • Method: Case study evaluating an AI model's translation, back-translation, and problem-solving on physics exam questions.
Why it matters

Large language models offer new opportunities to expand educational tools and assessments across languages. However, translating science-focused topics presents unique challenges and language-dependent issues that complicate translations.

Key findings
  • On a Newtonian physics exam, an AI tool answered questions remarkably well across translated languages and when translated back into English.
  • AI translations produced mistranslations and lacked exact scientific terms, which sometimes critically changed the physical meaning of the exam problems.
  • Numbering and lettering errors in some languages suggest the AI tool was not simply relying on memorized test questions from its training data.

Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?