Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

Towards Experience-Centered AI: A Framework for Integrating Lived Experience in Design and Development

Authors
Sanjana Gautam,
Mohit Chandra,
Ankolika De,
Tatiana Chakravorti,
Girik Malik,
Munmun De Choudhury
Date
Publisher
arXiv
Lived experiences fundamentally shape how individuals interact with AI systems, influencing perceptions of safety, trust, and usability. While prior research has focused on developing techniques to emulate human preferences, and proposed taxonomies to categorize risks (such as psychological harms and algorithmic biases), these efforts have provided limited systematic understanding of lived human experiences or actionable strategies for embedding them meaningfully into the AI development lifecycle. This work proposes a framework for meaningfully integrating lived experience into the design and evaluation of AI systems. We synthesize interdisciplinary literature across lived experience philosophy, human-centered design, and human-AI interaction, arguing that centering lived experience can lead to models that more accurately reflect the retrospective, emotional, and contextual dimensions of human cognition. Drawing from a wide body of work across psychology, education, healthcare, and social policy, we present a targeted taxonomy of lived experiences with specific applicability to AI systems. To ground our framework, we examine three application domains (i) education, (ii) healthcare, and (iii) cultural alignment, illustrating how lived experience informs user goals, system expectations, and ethical considerations in each context. We further incorporate insights from AI system operators and human-AI partnerships to highlight challenges in responsibility allocation, mental model calibration, and long-term system adaptation. We conclude with actionable recommendations for developing experience-centered AI systems that are not only technically robust but also empathetic, context-aware, and aligned with human realities. This work offers a foundation for future research that bridges technical development with the lived experiences of those impacted by AI systems.
Study at a glance
  • Question: How can developers meaningfully integrate people's lived experiences into the design and evaluation of AI systems?
  • Setting and data: Not stated in the abstract
  • Method: Interdisciplinary literature synthesis and framework development
Why it matters

Lived experiences shape how people interact with AI, yet prior research provides limited systematic understanding of these experiences or actionable strategies for embedding them meaningfully into the AI development lifecycle.

Key findings
  • In education, healthcare, and cultural settings, users' lived experiences shape their goals, ethical expectations, and perceptions of AI safety, trust, and usability.
  • Centering lived experience in AI design can help models more accurately reflect the emotional, retrospective, and contextual aspects of human thinking.
  • Human-AI partnerships face ongoing challenges in assigning responsibility, aligning user understanding, and adapting systems over the long term.

Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?