Date
Publisher
arXiv
This study examines the impact of Socratic Mind, a Generative Artificial
Intelligence (GenAI) powered formative assessment tool that employs Socratic
questioning to support student learning in a large, fully online
undergraduate-level computing course. Employing a quasi-experimental,
mixed-methods design, we investigated participants' engagement patterns, the
influence of user experience on engagement, and impacts on both perceived and
actual learning outcomes. Data were collected from the system logs, surveys on
user experience and perceived engagement and learning gains, student
reflections, and course performance data. Results indicated that participants
consistently reported high levels of affective, behavioral, and cognitive
engagement, and these were strongly linked to positive user experiences and
perceived learning outcomes. Quantitative analysis further revealed that
students who engaged with the GenAI tool experienced significant gains in their
quiz scores compared to those who did not, particularly benefiting students
with lower baseline achievement. Additionally, thematic analysis of qualitative
feedback revealed substantial perceived improvements in higher-order thinking
skills, including problem solving, critical thinking, and self-reflection. Our
findings highlight the promise of AI-mediated dialogue in fostering deeper
engagement and higher-order cognitive skills. As higher education institutions
expand GenAI integration in curriculum, this dialogic, GenAI powered assessment
tool can offer a scalable strategy to promote students' meaningful learning
outcomes.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
