Date
Publisher
British Journal of Educational Technology
While generative AI (GenAI) tools are emerging as educational resources, general-purpose applications like ChatGPT are not explicitly designed to support the metacognitive and socio-emotional dimensions of learning, often failing to address students' emotional states or promote independent thinking. In response, this study introduces a CVT-SRL GenAI Support Framework integrating control-value theory (CVT) and self-regulated learning (SRL) and tests a learner-centred GenAI chatbot design employing prompt-based SRL scaffolding and emotional support. In a preregistered experiment in an authentic educational setting, 144 high school students were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (1) ChatGPT, (2) SRLbot (GenAI with SRL scaffolding), (3) emotional SRLbot (GenAI with SRL and emotional support). Outcomes included conceptual knowledge and transfer, trace-based and self-reported engagement in SRL phases (forethought, performance, self-reflection), enjoyment, boredom, hopelessness, self-efficacy and trust. Data were collected at pretest, posttest and 4-week follow-up. Across conditions, students showed improvements in conceptual knowledge and transfer from pretest to posttest, with no significant condition differences in post-to-follow-up change. Both SRLbot and Emotional SRLbot were associated with higher self-reported enjoyment and lower boredom than ChatGPT and elicited trace-based SRL behaviours. Moreover, Emotional SRLbot prompted greater engagement in performance-phase and self-reflection processes than the other conditions. These findings provide preliminary evidence that GenAI agents integrating SRL and emotional scaffolding can support more positive emotional states and task-level SRL behaviours than general-purpose GenAI, highlighting control-value appraisals as a promising target for emotionally supportive SRL design. Future research should explore longitudinal effects on SRL skill development and independent regulation.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Study design

