Date
Publisher
arXiv
Modelling student knowledge is a key challenge when leveraging AI in education, with major implications for personalised learning. The Knowledge Tracing (KT) task aims to predict how students will respond to educational questions in learning environments, based on their prior interactions. Existing KT models typically use response correctness along with metadata like skill tags and timestamps, often overlooking the question text, which is an important source of pedagogical insight. This omission poses a lost opportunity while limiting predictive performance. We propose Next Token Knowledge Tracing (NTKT), a novel approach that reframes KT as a next-token prediction task using pretrained Large Language Models (LLMs). NTKT represents both student histories and question content as sequences of text, allowing LLMs to learn patterns in both behaviour and language. Our series of experiments significantly improves performance over state-of-the-art neural KT models and generalises much better to cold-start questions and users. These findings highlight the importance of question content in KT and demonstrate the benefits of leveraging pretrained representations of LLMs to model student learning more effectively.
Study at a glance
- Question: Can large language models better predict how students will answer questions by including question text?
- Setting and data: Not stated in the abstract
- Method: Computational experiments comparing a new language model approach against existing models for predicting student answers
Why it matters
Modeling student knowledge is a key challenge for personalized learning. However, existing knowledge tracing models often overlook question text, missing an important source of pedagogical insight and limiting predictive performance.
Key findings
- A language model approach predicted student responses significantly more accurately than existing tools by analyzing question text alongside past student answers.
- The model adapted significantly better when predicting performance for brand-new questions and new students without prior learning histories.
- Analyzing the actual wording of questions alongside student histories helped the artificial intelligence capture student learning patterns more effectively.
Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Why use AI?
Study design
