Search and Filter

Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

From Misunderstandings To Learning Opportunities: Leveraging Generative AI In Discussion Forums To Support Student Learning

Date
Publisher
arXiv
In the contemporary educational landscape, particularly in large classroom settings, discussion forums have become a crucial tool for promoting interaction and addressing student queries. These forums foster a collaborative learning environment where students engage with both the teaching team and their peers. However, the sheer volume of content generated in these forums poses two significant interconnected challenges: How can we effectively identify common misunderstandings that arise in student discussions? And once identified, how can instructors use these insights to address them effectively? This paper explores the approach to integrating large language models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to tackle these challenges. We then demonstrate the approach Misunderstanding to Mastery (M2M) with authentic data from three computer science courses, involving 1355 students with 2878 unique posts, followed by an evaluation with five instructors teaching these courses. Results show that instructors found the approach promising and valuable for teaching, effectively identifying misunderstandings and generating actionable insights. Instructors highlighted the need for more fine-grained groupings, clearer metrics, validation of the created resources, and ethical considerations around data anonymity.
Study at a glance
  • Question: How do instructors view using AI to identify forum misunderstandings and create learning resources to address them?
  • Setting and data: Three university computer science courses, 1,355 students, 2,878 unique discussion forum posts, and structured interviews with five instructors.
  • Method: System development and qualitative evaluation via structured instructor interviews.
Why it matters

The high volume of posts in large discussion forums makes it difficult for instructors to identify and address student misunderstandings, while insights often go unused without technological tools to operationalize them.

Key findings
  • All five instructors supported the M2M approach, viewing AI-identified student misunderstandings and generated learning opportunities as insightful, actionable, and valuable for weekly teaching.
  • Instructors confirmed the AI-detected misunderstandings were authentic and common, while emphasizing that instructors must serve as a final filter before sharing resources with students.
  • Participants noted benefits for coordinating instruction and targeting support, but raised concerns regarding student workload and suggested adding temporal filtering and severity rankings.

Summary drafted with AI from the full paper and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

Who is the user?
Who age?