Search and Filter

Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

M-Powering Teachers: Natural Language Processing Powered Feedback Improves 1:1 Instruction and Student Outcomes

Date
Publisher
EdWorkingPapers
Although learners are being connected 1:1 with instructors at an increasing scale, most of these instructors do not receive effective, consistent feedback to help them improve. We deployed MPowering Teachers, an automated tool based on natural language processing to give instructors feedback on dialogic instructional practices including their uptake of student contributions, talk time and questioning practices in a 1:1 online learning context. We conducted a randomized controlled trial on Polygence, a research mentorship platform for high schoolers (n=414 mentors) to evaluate the effectiveness of the feedback tool. We find that the intervention improved mentors uptake of student contributions by 10%, reduced their talk time by 5% and improved student experience with the program as well as their relative optimism about their academic future. These results corroborate existing evidence that scalable and low-cost automated feedback can improve instruction and learning in online educational contexts.
Study at a glance
  • Question: Does automated feedback improve online mentors' instruction and student outcomes in one-on-one learning?
  • Setting and data: Polygence, an online research mentorship platform for high schoolers, including 414 mentors.
  • Method: Randomized controlled trial.
Why it matters

Although learners are being connected 1:1 with instructors at an increasing scale, most of these instructors do not receive effective, consistent feedback to help them improve.

Key findings
  • In an online mentorship program with 414 high school mentors, automated feedback improved mentors' uptake of student contributions by 10%.
  • The automated feedback tool reduced mentors' talk time by 5%.
  • Automated feedback for mentors improved students' experience with the program and increased their optimism about their academic future.

Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

What is the application?
Who is the user?