Date
Publisher
arXiv
While foundation models (FMs), such as diffusion models and large vision-language models (LVLMs), have been widely applied in educational contexts, their ability to generate pedagogically effective visual explanations remains limited. Most existing approaches focus primarily on textual reasoning, overlooking the critical role of structured and interpretable visualizations in supporting conceptual understanding. To better assess the visual reasoning capabilities of FMs in educational settings, we introduce EduVisBench, a multi-domain, multi-level benchmark. EduVisBench features diverse STEM problem sets requiring visually grounded solutions, along with a fine-grained evaluation rubric informed by pedagogical theory. Our empirical analysis reveals that existing models frequently struggle with the inherent challenge of decomposing complex reasoning and translating it into visual representations aligned with human cognitive processes. To address these limitations, we propose EduVisAgent, a multi-agent collaborative framework that coordinates specialized agents for instructional planning, reasoning decomposition, metacognitive prompting, and visualization design. Experimental results show that EduVisAgent substantially outperforms all baselines, achieving a 40.2% improvement and delivering more educationally aligned visualizations. EduVisBench and EduVisAgent are available at github.com/aiming-lab/EduVisBench and github.com/aiming-lab/EduVisAgent.
Study at a glance
- Question: Can artificial intelligence generate effective visual explanations to help students understand complex science and math problems?
- Setting and data: Diverse STEM problem sets requiring visually grounded solutions.
- Method: Tests AI models on STEM problems using a pedagogical rubric and compares a new multi-agent framework against baseline models.
Why it matters
While foundation models are widely applied in education, their ability to generate pedagogically effective visual explanations remains limited. Most existing approaches focus on textual reasoning, overlooking the critical role of structured visualizations in supporting conceptual understanding.
Key findings
- In diverse STEM problem sets, a multi-agent AI system achieved a 40.2% improvement over standard models in generating educationally aligned visual explanations.
- Existing AI models frequently struggle to break down complex reasoning into visual representations that align with human cognitive processes.
- Most existing AI models focus primarily on text-based reasoning, limiting their ability to create structured visualizations that support conceptual understanding.
Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
