Date
Publisher
arXiv
The cognitive process of Search-as-Learning (SAL) is most effective when searching promotes active encoding of information. The rise of LLMs-based chatbots, which provide instant answers, introduces a trade-off between efficiency and depth of processing. Such answer-centric approaches accelerate information access, but they also raise concerns about shallower learning. To examine these issues in the context of SAL, we conducted a large-scale survey of educators and students to capture perceived risks and benefits of LLM-based chatbots. In addition, we adopted the encoding-storage paradigm to design a within-subjects experiment, where participants (N=92) engaged in SAL tasks using three different modalities: books, search engines, and chatbots. Our findings provide a counterintuitive insight into stakeholder concerns: while LLM-based chatbots and search engines validated perceived benefits on learning efficiency by outperforming book-based search in immediate conceptual understanding, they did not result in a long-term inferiority as feared. Our study provides insights for designing human-AI collaborative learning systems that promote cognitive engagement by balancing learning efficiency and long-term knowledge retention.
Study at a glance
- Question: How do AI chatbots affect search efficiency, immediate understanding, and long-term knowledge retention compared to books and search engines?
- Setting and data: South Korea; surveys of 75 educators and 92 university students, plus a controlled experiment with the 92 students, July 2024.
- Method: Mixed methods combining educator and student surveys with a counterbalanced within-subjects laboratory experiment.
Why it matters
Conversational chatbots speed up information access, but their impact on learning outcomes and stakeholder perceptions remains insufficiently compared to traditional search tools like textbooks and search engines.
Key findings
- Students using the chatbot completed significantly more search question-and-answer pairs and took less time per query than those using textbooks or search engines.
- Chatbots and search engines led to significantly higher immediate test scores than textbooks, but this boost was limited to basic understanding rather than application or analysis.
- Initial learning advantages from chatbots and search engines disappeared on a two-week delayed test, with retention scores remaining comparable across all three modalities.
Summary drafted with AI from the full paper and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
