Search and Filter

Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

Comparative Insights On Adversarial Machine Learning From Industry And Academia: A User-Study Approach

Date
Publisher
arXiv
An exponential growth of Machine Learning and its Generative AI applications brings with it significant security challenges, often referred to as Adversarial Machine Learning (AML). In this paper, we conducted two comprehensive studies to explore the perspectives of industry professionals and students on different AML vulnerabilities and their educational strategies. In our first study, we conducted an online survey with professionals revealing a notable correlation between cybersecurity education and concern for AML threats. For our second study, we developed two CTF challenges that implement Natural Language Processing and Generative AI concepts and demonstrate a poisoning attack on the training data set. The effectiveness of these challenges was evaluated by surveying undergraduate and graduate students at Carnegie Mellon University, finding that a CTF-based approach effectively engages interest in AML threats. Based on the responses of the participants in our research, we provide detailed recommendations emphasizing the critical need for integrated security education within the ML curriculum.
Study at a glance
  • Question: How do industry professionals view machine learning security, and can gamified challenges help students learn these threats?
  • Setting and data: 12 industry professionals and 15 university students (undergraduate and graduate) at Carnegie Mellon University.
  • Method: Mixed methods combining an online survey of professionals with a user study evaluating two prototype Capture-the-Flag challenges.
Why it matters

The exponential growth of machine learning and generative AI brings security challenges, yet practitioners and students often lack exposure, awareness, and tools to address adversarial threats.

Key findings
  • Professionals' concern for adversarial machine learning threats was correlated with a background in cybersecurity and privacy education, but not with a background in machine learning.
  • None of the surveyed industry practitioners reported using Capture-the-Flag platforms to stay informed about adversarial machine learning threats.
  • In the student user study, 12 of 15 participants solved the introductory challenge, whereas none solved the advanced chatbot poisoning challenge.

Summary drafted with AI from the full paper and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?