Search and Filter

Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

COGENT: A Curriculum-oriented Framework for Generating Grade-appropriate Educational Content

Authors
Zhengyuan Liu,
Stella Xin Yin,
Dion Hoe-Lian Goh,
Nancy F. Chen
Date
Publisher
arXiv
While Generative AI has demonstrated strong potential and versatility in content generation, its application to educational contexts presents several challenges. Models often fail to align with curriculum standards and maintain grade-appropriate reading levels consistently. Furthermore, STEM education poses additional challenges in balancing scientific explanations with everyday language when introducing complex and abstract ideas and phenomena to younger students. In this work, we propose COGENT, a curriculum-oriented framework for generating grade-appropriate educational content. We incorporate three curriculum components (science concepts, core ideas, and learning objectives), control readability through length, vocabulary, and sentence complexity, and adopt a ``wonder-based'' approach to increase student engagement and interest. We conduct a multi-dimensional evaluation via both LLM-as-a-judge and human expert analysis. Experimental results show that COGENT consistently produces grade-appropriate passages that are comparable or superior to human references. Our work establishes a viable approach for scaling adaptive and high-quality learning resources.
Study at a glance
  • Question: How can AI generate curriculum-aligned, grade-appropriate science content for students?
  • Setting and data: Not stated in the abstract.
  • Method: Framework development evaluated using automated AI judges and human expert analysis
Why it matters

Generative AI models often fail to align with curriculum standards and maintain grade-appropriate reading levels consistently. Furthermore, STEM education poses challenges in balancing scientific explanations with everyday language when introducing complex ideas to younger students.

Key findings
  • In STEM education for younger students, a curriculum-focused AI framework consistently produced grade-appropriate passages that matched or exceeded human-written materials.
  • Standard generative AI models frequently fail to align with curriculum standards and struggle to maintain consistent, grade-appropriate reading levels.
  • Generative AI tools struggle to balance scientific explanations with accessible everyday language when introducing complex ideas to younger learners.

Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

What is the application?
Who age?