Date
Publisher
arXiv
Inference making is an essential but complex skill in reading comprehension
(RC). Some inferences require resolving references across sentences, and some
rely on using prior knowledge to fill in the detail that is not explicitly
written in the text. Diagnostic RC questions can help educators provide more
effective and targeted reading instruction and interventions for school-age
students. We introduce a taxonomy of inference types for RC and use it to
analyze the distribution of items within a diagnostic RC item bank. Next, we
present experiments using GPT-4o to generate bridging-inference RC items for
given reading passages via few-shot prompting, comparing conditions with and
without chain-of-thought prompts. Generated items were evaluated on three
aspects: overall item quality, appropriate inference type, and LLM reasoning,
achieving high inter-rater agreements above 0.90. Our results show that GPT-4o
produced 93.8% good-quality questions suitable for operational use in grade
3-12 contexts; however, only 42.6% of the generated questions accurately
matched the targeted inference type. We conclude that combining automatic item
generation with human judgment offers a promising path toward scalable,
high-quality diagnostic RC assessments.
Study at a glance
- Question: Can AI generate high-quality reading comprehension questions that test students' ability to make inferences?
- Setting and data: Reading passages and a diagnostic reading comprehension question bank for grades 3–12
- Method: Experiments evaluating AI-generated reading comprehension questions across different prompt conditions using raters
Why it matters
Inference making is an essential but complex skill in reading comprehension. Diagnostic questions can help educators provide more effective and targeted reading instruction and interventions for school-age students.
Key findings
- In grade 3–12 reading comprehension, generative AI produced good-quality questions 93.8% of the time, making them suitable for operational use.
- Only 42.6% of the AI-generated reading questions accurately matched the targeted inference type.
- Human evaluators achieved high agreement when rating the AI-generated questions for overall quality, inference type, and underlying reasoning.
Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Why use AI?
Study design
