Date
Publisher
arXiv
The evaluation of academic theses is a cornerstone of higher education,
ensuring rigor and integrity. Traditional methods, though effective, are
time-consuming and subject to evaluator variability. This paper presents
RubiSCoT, an AI-supported framework designed to enhance thesis evaluation from
proposal to final submission. Using advanced natural language processing
techniques, including large language models, retrieval-augmented generation,
and structured chain-of-thought prompting, RubiSCoT offers a consistent,
scalable solution. The framework includes preliminary assessments,
multidimensional assessments, content extraction, rubric-based scoring, and
detailed reporting. We present the design and implementation of RubiSCoT,
discussing its potential to optimize academic assessment processes through
consistent, scalable, and transparent evaluation.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
