Date
Publisher
arXiv
Large Language Models are now common in student assessment, but we know little about how student demographics affect their use. Sometimes, considering student demographics may be necessary -- for example, to improve readability for users with lower educational levels. However, it also risks being a cause of discrimination, e.g., when assigning lower scores to students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. We set up controlled prompts to test 1) explicit demographic effects, where we mention demographic details directly, and 2) implicit effects, where we use conversation history as a demographic signal. We test these settings in three tasks: Automated Essay Scoring, Formative Feedback, and Metalinguistic Question Answering. We test six state-of-the-art LLMs on these tasks. In both explicit and implicit cases, the models pick up on demographic cues and can change their scoring, feedback, and answers accordingly. We find that LLMs frequently adjust the readability of feedback to education levels when these are explicitly mentioned. On the other hand, implicit conditions produce unpredictable biases, such as in question answering, where responses from lower-education levels receive lower sentiment scores. Our results provide clear evidence of demographic sensitivity in LLMs for educational assessment tasks.
Study at a glance
- Question: Do explicit demographic details or implicit conversational cues systematically change how AI models evaluate and answer student work?
- Setting and data: Benchmarking study analyzing 192,480 model outputs across 40 essays, 40 metalinguistic questions, and 200 real user demographic profiles.
- Method: Controlled counterfactual experiment comparing default, explicit persona, and implicit chat history prompts using regularized regression and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests.
Why it matters
Large language models are rapidly used for student scoring and feedback, but demographic signals may cause discrimination or unfairly alter outputs across student backgrounds.
Key findings
- In essay scoring, implicit conversation history caused Llama-70B scores to inflate by 1.57 points relative to default, while explicit demographics caused small shifts.
- Across models answering metalinguistic questions, explicit indications of higher user education consistently resulted in less readable, more complex responses.
- Implicit cues led models to produce longer responses and less predictable shifts in tone and sentiment, particularly for users mentioning specific technologies or writing tasks.
Summary drafted with AI from the full paper and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
