Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

The Responsible Development of Automated Student Feedback with Generative AI

Authors
Euan D Lindsay,
Mike Zhang,
Aditya Johri,
Johannes Bjerva
Date
Publisher
arXiv
Providing rich, constructive feedback to students is essential for supporting and enhancing their learning. Recent advancements in Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly with large language models (LLMs), present new opportunities to deliver scalable, repeatable, and instant feedback, effectively making abundant a resource that has historically been scarce and costly. From a technical perspective, this approach is now feasible due to breakthroughs in AI and Natural Language Processing (NLP). While the potential educational benefits are compelling, implementing these technologies also introduces a host of ethical considerations that must be thoughtfully addressed. One of the core advantages of AI systems is their ability to automate routine and mundane tasks, potentially freeing up human educators for more nuanced work. However, the ease of automation risks a ``tyranny of the majority'', where the diverse needs of minority or unique learners are overlooked, as they may be harder to systematize and less straightforward to accommodate. Ensuring inclusivity and equity in AI-generated feedback, therefore, becomes a critical aspect of responsible AI implementation in education. The process of developing machine learning models that produce valuable, personalized, and authentic feedback also requires significant input from human domain experts. Decisions around whose expertise is incorporated, how it is captured, and when it is applied have profound implications for the relevance and quality of the resulting feedback. Additionally, the maintenance and continuous refinement of these models are necessary to adapt feedback to evolving contextual, theoretical, and student-related factors. Without ongoing adaptation, feedback risks becoming obsolete or mismatched with the current needs of diverse student populations [...]
Study at a glance
  • Question: How can generative AI be developed responsibly to provide equitable and effective feedback to students?
  • Setting and data: Not stated in the abstract
  • Method: Not stated in the abstract
Why it matters

Generative AI can deliver instant, scalable student feedback, but automation risks overlooking the needs of minority or unique learners. Without human expertise and continuous refinement, feedback risks becoming obsolete or mismatched with diverse student populations.

Key findings
  • Generative AI can deliver scalable, instant student feedback and automate routine tasks, potentially freeing educators for more nuanced work.
  • Automating feedback risks overlooking the diverse needs of minority or unique learners because those needs are harder to systematize and accommodate.
  • Producing valuable, personalized feedback requires human expert input and continuous refinement to avoid becoming obsolete or mismatched with evolving student needs.

Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

Who is the user?
Who age?