Date
Publisher
arXiv
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs), which integrate language and visual
cues for problem-solving, are crucial for advancing artificial general
intelligence (AGI). However, current benchmarks for measuring the intelligence
of MLLMs suffer from limited scale, narrow coverage, and unstructured
knowledge, offering only static and undifferentiated evaluations. To bridge
this gap, we introduce MDK12-Bench, a large-scale multidisciplinary benchmark
built from real-world K-12 exams spanning six disciplines with 141K instances
and 6,225 knowledge points organized in a six-layer taxonomy. Covering five
question formats with difficulty and year annotations, it enables comprehensive
evaluation to capture the extent to which MLLMs perform over four dimensions:
1) difficulty levels, 2) temporal (cross-year) shifts, 3) contextual shifts,
and 4) knowledge-driven reasoning. We propose a novel dynamic evaluation
framework that introduces unfamiliar visual, textual, and question form shifts
to challenge model generalization while improving benchmark objectivity and
longevity by mitigating data contamination. We further evaluate knowledge-point
reference-augmented generation (KP-RAG) to examine the role of knowledge in
problem-solving. Key findings reveal limitations in current MLLMs in multiple
aspects and provide guidance for enhancing model robustness, interpretability,
and AI-assisted education.
Study at a glance
- Question: How well do artificial intelligence models combining text and images perform on real-world K-12 school exam questions?
- Setting and data: 141,000 real-world K-12 exam questions across six disciplines, covering five question formats with difficulty and year annotations.
- Method: Tests AI models on exam questions under changing visual, textual, and question formats (dynamic evaluation framework).
Why it matters
Current benchmarks for measuring the intelligence of multimodal large language models suffer from limited scale, narrow coverage, and unstructured knowledge, offering only static and undifferentiated evaluations.
Key findings
- Across 141,000 real-world K-12 exam questions covering six subjects, current multimodal AI models showed performance limitations across multiple evaluated areas.
- Multimodal AI models demonstrated limitations when challenged by unfamiliar visual, textual, and question format shifts.
- Multimodal AI models exhibited limitations in knowledge-driven reasoning across varying difficulty levels and school years.
Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
Who is the user?
Why use AI?
Study design
