Date
Publisher
arXiv
Large language models (LLMs) hold great promise for educational applications,
particularly in intelligent tutoring systems. However, effective tutoring
requires alignment with pedagogical strategies - something current LLMs lack
without task-specific adaptation. In this work, we explore whether fine-grained
annotation of teacher intents can improve the quality of LLM-generated tutoring
responses. We focus on MathDial, a dialog dataset for math instruction, and
apply an automated annotation framework to re-annotate a portion of the dataset
using a detailed taxonomy of eleven pedagogical intents. We then fine-tune an
LLM using these new annotations and compare its performance to models trained
on the original four-category taxonomy. Both automatic and qualitative
evaluations show that the fine-grained model produces more pedagogically
aligned and effective responses. Our findings highlight the value of intent
specificity for controlled text generation in educational settings, and we
release our annotated data and code to facilitate further research.
Study at a glance
- Question: Does labeling specific teacher intentions improve the quality of AI-generated tutoring responses?
- Setting and data: A portion of the MathDial dialogue dataset for math instruction.
- Method: Compares AI tutoring models trained on detailed versus broad teaching intents using automatic and qualitative evaluations.
Why it matters
Large language models hold great promise for intelligent tutoring systems, but effective tutoring requires alignment with pedagogical strategies that current models lack without task-specific adaptation.
Key findings
- In math instruction dialogues, an AI tutor trained on 11 detailed teaching intents generated more pedagogically aligned and effective responses than four broader categories.
- Current large language models lack alignment with effective teaching strategies unless they are specifically adapted for educational tasks.
- Highly specific instructional intents improve the quality and control of AI-generated responses in educational settings.
Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
