Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

How do students use ChatGPT as a writing support?

Authors
Sarah Levine,
Sarah W. Beck,
Chris Mah,
Lena Phalen,
Jaylen Pittman
Date
Publisher
International Literacy Association
Educators and researchers are interested in ways that ChatGPT and other generative AI tools might move beyond the role of cheatbot and become part of the network of resources students use for writing. We studied how high school students used ChatGPT as a writing support while writing arguments about topics like school mascots. We asked: What did students prompt ChatGPT to do? And how did students take up ChatGPT's responses to those prompts? We used Flower and Hayes' writing model to analyze screencasts of students interacting with ChatGPT and one another as they planned, drafted, and reviewed their arguments. Our data show that while planning and drafting, students primarily asked ChatGPT for ideas and then built upon those ideas to develop their own arguments. While reviewing, they generally used ChatGPT as they might use Grammarly or other editing tools. Students also compared their writing with that of ChatGPT, which allowed them to identify their unique writing voices and build meta-level understandings of rhetorical choices and effects. Our study indicates that ChatGPT can become a part of a social, distributed model of writing, and that students can use ChatGPT as a resource for writing without sidestepping the processes of planning, drafting, and reviewing.
Study at a glance
  • Question: How do high school students prompt ChatGPT and use its responses while writing arguments?
  • Setting and data: High school students writing arguments; screencasts of students interacting with ChatGPT and each other.
  • Method: Analysis of screencasts of students writing (using Flower and Hayes' writing model).
Why it matters

Educators and researchers are interested in how ChatGPT and other generative AI tools might move beyond the role of cheatbot and become part of the network of resources students use for writing.

Key findings
  • In high school argument writing, students primarily asked ChatGPT for ideas while planning and drafting, building on them to develop their own arguments.
  • Comparing their work to ChatGPT's text helped students identify their unique writing voices and understand the effects of rhetorical choices.
  • While reviewing, students generally used ChatGPT like an editing tool, treating AI as a resource without skipping planning, drafting, and reviewing.

Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

Who is the user?