Date
Publisher
arXiv
Understanding the factors that shape students' mathematics performance is
vital for designing effective educational policies. This study applies
explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques to PISA 2018 data to
predict math achievement and identify key predictors across ten countries
(67,329 students). We tested four models: Multiple Linear Regression (MLR),
Random Forest (RF), CATBoost, and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), using
student, family, and school variables. Models were trained on 70% of the data
(with 5-fold cross-validation) and tested on 30%, stratified by country.
Performance was assessed with R^2 and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). To ensure
interpretability, we used feature importance, SHAP values, and decision tree
visualizations. Non-linear models, especially RF and ANN, outperformed MLR,
with RF balancing accuracy and generalizability. Key predictors included
socio-economic status, study time, teacher motivation, and students' attitudes
toward mathematics, though their impact varied across countries. Visual
diagnostics such as scatterplots of predicted vs actual scores showed RF and
CATBoost aligned closely with actual performance. Findings highlight the
non-linear and context-dependent nature of achievement and the value of XAI in
educational research. This study uncovers cross-national patterns, informs
equity-focused reforms, and supports the development of personalized learning
strategies.
Study at a glance
- Question: How accurately can artificial intelligence predict students' math achievement and identify the key factors shaping their performance?
- Setting and data: PISA 2018 data from 67,329 students across ten countries, including student, family, and school variables.
- Method: Predictive modeling comparing four algorithms on training and test data, evaluated using interpretability tools (explainable artificial intelligence).
Why it matters
Understanding the factors that shape students' mathematics performance is vital for designing effective educational policies.
Key findings
- Across 67,329 students in ten countries, advanced artificial intelligence models predicted mathematics achievement more accurately than traditional linear models.
- Socioeconomic status, study time, teacher motivation, and students' attitudes toward mathematics were the most important predictors of math performance.
- The impact of these key predictors on mathematics achievement varied across different countries.
Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
