Date
Publisher
arXiv
Cultivating higher-order cognitive abilities -- such as knowledge integration, critical thinking, and creativity -- in modern STEM education necessitates a pedagogical shift from passive knowledge transmission to active Socratic construction. Although Large Language Models (LLMs) hold promise for STEM Interdisciplinary education, current methodologies employing Prompt Engineering (PE), Supervised Fine-tuning (SFT), or standard Reinforcement Learning (RL) often fall short of supporting this paradigm. Existing methods are hindered by three fundamental challenges: the inability to dynamically model latent student cognitive states; severe reward sparsity and delay inherent in long-term educational goals; and a tendency toward policy collapse lacking strategic diversity due to reliance on behavioral cloning. Recognizing the unobservability and dynamic complexity of these interactions, we formalize the Socratic Interdisciplinary Instructional Problem (SIIP) as a structured Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP), demanding simultaneous global exploration and fine-grained policy refinement. To this end, we propose ERL4SIIP, a novel Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning (ERL) framework specifically tailored for this domain. ERL4SIIP integrates: (1) a dynamic student simulator grounded in a STEM knowledge graph for latent state modeling; (2) a Hierarchical Reward Mechanism that decomposes long-horizon goals into dense signals; and (3) a LoRA-Division based optimization strategy coupling evolutionary algorithms for population-level global search with PPO for local gradient ascent.
Study at a glance
- Question: Can an evolutionary reinforcement learning framework improve an AI tutor's ability to guide students through Socratic STEM instruction?
- Setting and data: 20,000 multi-turn STEM dialogues from the Socratic Interdisciplinary Dialogues benchmark and 100 interaction threads from the Dayi K-12 platform evaluated by educational experts.
- Method: Algorithm development and model evaluation using simulated student environments, automated scoring, and expert evaluations (evolutionary reinforcement learning).
Why it matters
Current AI tutors often default to direct answers rather than guiding students through Socratic questioning to build higher-order STEM skills.
Key findings
- The ERL4SIIP tutor outperformed baselines in instructional quality, achieving an 82.50% Level-3 guidance rate and a strategy diversity score of 36.80.
- Simulated students interacting with ERL4SIIP reached higher knowledge integration (58.12%), knowledge transfer (4.45 out of 5), and critical thinking counts (3.85).
- In a blind evaluation, educational experts selected the framework's student simulator as authentic K-12 behavior 41.7% of the time, statistically matching real students at 42.1%.
Summary drafted with AI from the full paper and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Study design
