Date
Publisher
arXiv
Understanding how individuals perceive and recall information in their natural environments is critical to understanding potential failures in perception (e.g., sensory loss) and memory (e.g., dementia). Event segmentation, the process of identifying distinct events within dynamic environments, is central to how we perceive, encode, and recall experiences. This cognitive process not only influences moment-to-moment comprehension but also shapes event specific memory. Despite the importance of event segmentation and event memory, current research methodologies rely heavily on human judgements for assessing segmentation patterns and recall ability, which are subjective and time-consuming. A few approaches have been introduced to automate event segmentation and recall scoring, but validity with human responses and ease of implementation require further advancements. To address these concerns, we leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate event segmentation and assess recall, employing chat completion and text-embedding models, respectively. We validated these models against human annotations and determined that LLMs can accurately identify event boundaries, and that human event segmentation is more consistent with LLMs than among humans themselves. Using this framework, we advanced an automated approach for recall assessments which revealed semantic similarity between segmented narrative events and participant recall can estimate recall performance. Our findings demonstrate that LLMs can effectively simulate human segmentation patterns and provide recall evaluations that are a scalable alternative to manual scoring. This research opens novel avenues for studying the intersection between perception, memory, and cognitive impairment using methodologies driven by artificial intelligence.
Study at a glance
- Question: Can artificial intelligence accurately identify event boundaries and evaluate how well people remember experiences?
- Setting and data: Not stated in the abstract
- Method: Compares AI-generated event segmentation and automated recall scoring with human annotations
Why it matters
Assessing how people perceive and recall events relies heavily on subjective, time-consuming human judgments. Existing automated tools still require advancements in ease of implementation and validity with human responses.
Key findings
- Large language models accurately identified event boundaries, aligning more consistently with human judgments than humans did with each other.
- Comparing the meaning between AI-segmented events and participant recall successfully estimated participants' memory performance.
- Large language models provided automated recall evaluations that offer a scalable alternative to time-consuming manual scoring.
Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
