Date
Publisher
EdArXiv
Learning to read is among the most consequential skills students learn and is a critical skill for long-term success. Research suggests that direct and explicit instruction in phonics skills in earlygrades increases the likelihood that students develop the foundational literacy skills they need to become proficient readers. One approach to increasing access to explicit phonics instruction is through tutoring. However, tutoring is resource and time intensive. One approach to address this limitation is to leverage technology, including artificial-intelligence (AI) reading tutors. In this study, we explored the effect of one such tutor, the Project Read Tutor. Four elementary schools in one Indiana district deployed the Project Read Tutor, and nearly all of the 838 students in kindergarten through Grade 2 were exposed to it (97%) but used it sparingly (median = 6.7 min per week). First, we compared high-dose users (15 min per week or more) with near-zero users (fewer than 2 min per week) within schools, achieving baseline equivalence through propensity weighting; this contrast showed a medium effect on the end-of-year DIBELS composite (Hedges's g = 0.47). Second, we estimated a continuous dose-response within classrooms using teacher fixed effects: each additional 10 min per week predicted 7.1 composite percentile points (g = 0.24, p = .004) across 43 classroom clusters, and the association was statistically significantly larger for students who began the year with weaker reading skills and for students with disabilities. Dose effects extended across DIBELS subtests with a near-transfer gradient: strongest for the code-focused skills the tutor teaches and roughly half the size for connected-textfluency. Among the 520 students who began the year below benchmark, each additional 10 min per week was associated with 2.40 times the odds of ending the year at or above benchmark, with the predicted probability of reaching benchmark rising from .31 at near-zero use to .68 at 30min per week. Within the schools that adopted the tutor, dose, not access, predicted reading growth
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design

