Date
Publisher
arXiv
Collaborative group projects are integral to computer science education, as
they foster teamwork, problem-solving skills, and industry-relevant
competencies. However, assessing individual contributions within group settings
has long been a challenge. Traditional assessment strategies, such as the equal
distribution of grades or subjective peer assessments, often fall short in
terms of fairness, objectivity, and scalability, particularly in large
classrooms. This paper introduces a semi-automated, AI-assisted grading system
that evaluates both project quality and individual effort using repository
mining, communication analytics, and machine learning models. The system
comprises modules for project evaluation, contribution analysis, and grade
computation, integrating seamlessly with platforms like GitHub. A pilot
deployment in a senior-level course demonstrated high alignment with instructor
assessments, increased student satisfaction, and reduced instructor grading
effort. We conclude by discussing implementation considerations, ethical
implications, and proposed enhancements to broaden applicability.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Why use AI?
