Date
Publisher
arXiv
The use of natural language processing (NLP) techniques in engineering education can provide valuable insights into the underlying processes involved in generating text. While accessing these insights can be labor-intensive if done manually, recent advances in NLP and large language models have made it a realistic option for individuals. This study explores and evaluates a combination of clustering, summarization, and prompting techniques to analyze over 1,000 student essays in which students discussed their career interests. The specific assignment prompted students to define and explain their career goals as engineers. Using text embedding representations of student responses, we clustered the responses together to identify thematically similar statements from students. The clustered responses were then summarized to quickly identify career interest themes. We also used a set of a priori codes about career satisfaction and sectors to demonstrate an alternative approach to using these generative text models to analyze student writing. The results of this study demonstrate the feasibility and usefulness of NLP techniques in engineering education research. By automating the initial analysis of student essays, researchers and educators can more efficiently and accurately identify key themes and patterns in student writing. The methods presented in this paper have broader applications for engineering education and research purposes beyond analyzing student essays. By explaining these methods to the engineering education community, readers can utilize them in their own contexts.
Study at a glance
- Question: Can artificial intelligence help researchers analyze themes in student essays about their career goals?
- Setting and data: Over 1,000 student essays about engineering career goals.
- Method: Tests AI clustering, summarization, and prompting techniques to analyze and categorize student writing.
Why it matters
Using natural language processing provides valuable insights into the processes involved in generating text, but manual analysis is labor-intensive. Recent advances in large language models have made accessing these insights a realistic option for individuals.
Key findings
- In over 1,000 engineering student essays, automated language tools enabled educators to identify key themes and patterns more efficiently and accurately.
- Natural language processing demonstrated clear feasibility and usefulness for analyzing student text in engineering education research.
- Generative text models proved capable of evaluating student writing against predetermined categories of career satisfaction and employment sectors.
Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
